4 ms·
The abridged summary here elides that 1 is a history of claims of intolerable harm being proved wrong, not that every claim has already been proved wrong. In th
by zamadatix 2y ago
The abridged summary here elides that 1 is a history of claims of intolerable harm being proved wrong, not that every claim has already been proved wrong. In this frame that too many people kept raising alarms equivalent to "cars with driving assistance will cause a bloodbath" which then come to pass, not that there are no further safety alarmist claims left about what could be coming next as the technology changes.
Keeping it focused on AI every release of a text, image, and voice generator has come with PR, delays, news articles, and discussion about how it's dangerous and we need to hold it back. 3 months after they release politics hasn't collapsed from a 10 fold increase in fake news, discussion boards online are still as (un)usable as they were before, art is still a thing people do, and so on. That doesn't mean there are no valid safety concerns just that the alarmist track record isn't particularly compelling to most while the value of the tools continues to grow.