3 ms·
You'll see this often on the Internet: proof? Proof? Citation? Boy, no one's going to do any work for you. If you believe the wrong thing, the consequences are
by renewiltord 2y ago
You'll see this often on the Internet: proof? Proof? Citation? Boy, no one's going to do any work for you. If you believe the wrong thing, the consequences are your own.
In fact, only people with no better use for their time will spend their time teaching you. This means you're being taught only by people whose time is worthless or for whom it is useful for you to believe in something.
If you're not paying for the knowledge, you're not the customer, you're the product. I never elucidate for those beneath me in understanding. I only discuss with peers.
Perhaps the only capable person I know who does different is Taleb but his pleasure appears to be in calling someone "imbecile" after proving them wrong.
- wozniacki 2y agoI was waiting the whole time I read this to find a /s somewhere. Anywhere. Yikes.
- hju22_-3 2y agoI will agree that it is big yikes. But I will, at least kind of, agree that you are more likely to meet more arm chair scientists than you are scientists and actual field experts online in this fashion. Though, obviously, there are actual scientists and field experts around. The issue, as always, is how to differenciate them from the not-so-obviously fake ones as a layman. But yes. Still big yikes.
- bheadmaster 2y ago> Yikes. Proof? Citation? Jokes aside, I find that this sentence makes much sense, especially in the context of online forums such as HN or Reddit: In fact, only people with no better use for their time will spend their time teaching you. This means you're being taught only by people whose time is worthless or for whom it is useful for you to believe in something. Why do you think that is inaccurate?
- hashiyakshmi 2y agoBecause there are plenty of people who just enjoy explaining things or helping others understand, and to say the only two reasons for that behavior is that their time is worthless or they have an agenda is myopic.
- latexr 2y ago> Why do you think that is inaccurate? Not only is it inaccurate, it is insulting to the person teaching you. Have you never been on a popular HN thread where a known expert in the field, someone who’s more productive and knowledgeable than you, provides context? But somehow because they did you feel it justified to call their time worthless? Well, certainly I’d regret wasting my time on someone like that and I’d hope the other readers were more appreciative. What the OP is calling a “better use of time” I’m reading “more selfish use of time”. Maybe, just maybe, the person spending their time teaching others doesn’t consider their time worthless, but they manage it better and thus have some moments to share their knowledge. Or maybe they enjoy doing so. This is not a hard concept for those not affected by such a superiority complex they claim there are others “beneath [them] in understanding”.
- bheadmaster 2y agoThat makes sense, thanks for the perspective. Much better than just "yikes". I hate tweetspeak.
- protomolecule 2y agoBecause some people want make the world a better place. Or simply enjoy sharing knowledge.
- zo1 2y agoI only wish for people to take a "little bit" of a charitable interpretation of my comments. Lot of time they simply find one little gap, wrong wording, etc and just run with it and dismiss my entire comment. I do it too, sometimes, but I like to think I do it for a reason. Alas, we're all humans: greedy, and biased towards our own views.
- renewiltord 2y agoPrecisely. They usually come to you with misbelief and intentional miscomprehension. I don’t think it is worth convincing someone of the truth if they insist on finding a way to believe a falsehood. Let them believe.