3 ms·
Probably because the title of the article uses 402,000,000 Mbps and I think there’s a rule(?) on HN about not misrepresenting titles or rewording them too much,
by ubutler 2y ago
Probably because the title of the article uses 402,000,000 Mbps and I think there’s a rule(?) on HN about not misrepresenting titles or rewording them too much, though I’d wager 402 Tbps is fair alteration.