Some of the arguments I've read by philosophers seem like they are focusing on pure logic to prove a point or find weakness in another, but the linkage between

Some of the arguments I've read by philosophers seem like they are focusing on pure logic to prove a point or find weakness in another, but the linkage between those logic stmts and reality don't always seem to be considered. It's almost like they are purely focused on symbolic logic, even if the stmts and symbols don't truly map to reality unambiguously, or without contradictions.