2 ms·
"promises ‘no code’ from rivals" The article is quite good, but the headline seems clickbait and wrong. I do not recall Kling making such statements, rather:
by lukan 2y ago
"promises ‘no code’ from rivals"
The article is quite good, but the headline seems clickbait and wrong.
I do not recall Kling making such statements, rather:
"we implement web standards ourselves,” ruling out adopting a third-party engine in its entirety."
So not just using webkit, yes. But copying code how to handle a CSS case, or a wasm implementation, is not ruled out as far as I know.
- rhdunn 2y agoFrom ladybird.org: > What does "No code from other browsers" really mean? > The focus of the Ladybird project is to build a new browser engine from the ground up. We don't use code from Blink, WebKit, Gecko, or any other browser engine.
- lukan 2y agoOk then, my bad, I have not checked the website, but I think that quote should belong in the article as well. (And I also would disagree to that absolute choice of using no other browser code at all)
- greenthrow 2y ago"We implement web standards ourselves" would seem to be entirely at odds with your last sentence.