3 ms·
The opening position of backgammon always worries me, not because it is bad, but because I don't understand it. And backgammon is old enough that getting to the
by somat 2y ago
The opening position of backgammon always worries me, not because it is bad, but because I don't understand it. And backgammon is old enough that getting to the origin and meaning behind the position is not trivial.
My best guess is that the game started out with all the pieces off the board and you had to get them all on and around and off the far side. However this takes too long and some bright Persians who understood the game far more than me who only plays an occasional game with my father started creating and playing strategic openings. Positions with interesting interactions with the dice but now the game was much shorter and exciting. And the game we all play and enjoy today was one of the more popular openings.
A good theory, hard to prove. But why on earth do you start with five tokens already in your home???
- tslocum 2y agoI think the opening position evolved out of a desire for more interesting openings and resulting middle and end games. The position does seem strange at first, but it is sort of the foundation for more sensible positions, like turning 6-1 into a fortification of two pieces on the same space. Without the opening position, you would only have at most one checker on a space with this roll. I have absolutely nothing to prove any of this, it's purely speculation, as this is something I've wondered about as well.