I think you're misstating it. Chomsky has always been focused on pragmatic actions within the situation you are in. If that's Spain in the 1920s, he would be a

I think you're misstating it. Chomsky has always been focused on pragmatic actions within the situation you are in. If that's Spain in the 1920s, he would be a Revolutionary Anarchist. But most of the time he's speaking, it's not about Spain in the 1920s, so the specifics of actions that are pragmatic are different. Similar to what you are saying, and I agree with some of what you're saying, but it would be incorrect to define Chomsky based on the tactics he feels are valid in a given situation.