3 ms·
It literally failed due to the concentrated efforts of the world. That's historical fact. That doesn't mean it wouldn't have failed for specific reasons if all
by AndyNemmity 2y ago
It literally failed due to the concentrated efforts of the world. That's historical fact.
That doesn't mean it wouldn't have failed for specific reasons if allowed to continue, however we don't know what that failure would be, and stating it as was done, is a ridiculous idea.
- pixl97 2y agoWelcome to the world that will gladly concentrate its efforts against you, reiterating the point of the post above you. Which may be the answer to this entire thread, anarchism isn't going to work unless the world decides to let it work (hint, people in power aren't going to let this happen).
- Log_out_ 2y agoAnd yet some like the swiss survive the whole world preparing to come down on them.it can be done .. nowadays with weapons of mass destruction more than ever.
- AndyNemmity 2y agoThat is a central issue with a society based on something other than the Authority of Privately owned dictatorships. How to reasonably change from a method of complete control, to one which opens the door for other paths. I don't disagree with that. It has been, and always will be the central question on how to remove dictatorships.
- kstenerud 2y ago"THE ENEMY" will never allow it to work. That's what keeps the idealist dream alive (for the struggle!), and why I'm not worried that you'll make any progress.
- AndyNemmity 2y agoThis is such a superficial argument against. You can make much more substantive arguments against Anarchism that are reasoned, and reasonable. Making things up instead of understanding the historical record is a choice.