The description of Weavers' communication style makes me think about how my brother in law mostly communicates. Usually he tosses up 'interesting' "facts". Ofte

The description of Weavers' communication style makes me think about how my brother in law mostly communicates. Usually he tosses up 'interesting' "facts". Often I get annoyed, not because I think it doesn't lead to a conclusion (I do like to phylosophise without such goal), but the fact that most of these "facts" are blatantly incorrect and there is no good way to communicate that to him.