I wouldn't include codegen under biphasic programming, which is, according to the lede of The Fine Article: > characterized by languages and frameworks that en

I wouldn't include codegen under biphasic programming, which is, according to the lede of The Fine Article: > characterized by languages and frameworks that enable identical syntax to express computations executed in two distinct phases or environments while maintaining consistent behavior (i.e., semantics) across phases Munging together strings into something which is hopefully source code is the ultimate escape valve for languages which have poor or nonexistent facilities for biphasic programming. You compile a program, it executes, it spits out a program, you compile that and run it. That isn't biphasic: it's one phase, twice.