3 ms·
I always feel conflicted by these kind of announcements, because for me there is significant value in spreading my dependencies across different companies, to r
by ajb 2y ago
I always feel conflicted by these kind of announcements, because for me there is significant value in spreading my dependencies across different companies, to reduce risk. I think Proton are great, I would like them to succeed - but I'm not sure I want to put all my eggs in their basket.
- ivan_gammel 2y agoThis specific case seems reasonable. Mail implies Drive (you want to keep large attachments somewhere), both imply Docs (you want to preview those docs somewhere and maybe add some edits). If you want to diversify, Pass may be a good candidate for not using it.
- michaelmior 2y ago> both imply Docs You can certainly implement an attachment viewer without having a full fledged document editor.
- ivan_gammel 2y agoOpening documents in read-only mode is MVP, but users often want feature parity. This topic is popular on Proton’s uservoice.
- iamkonstantin 2y agoThen you should welcome the announcement as it offers yet another alternative for hosting docs. I don't think Proton implies that you must use the entire bundle of services — you could always mix and match them with other providers (or self-host, for the ultimate freedom).