3 ms·
> Charging for use below what it costs to maintain that use is probably a bad idea. I disagree. that's absolutely not a valid conclusion for a service (public
by SideburnsOfDoom 2y ago
> Charging for use below what it costs to maintain that use is probably a bad idea.
I disagree. that's absolutely not a valid conclusion for a service (public transport, road infrastructure, healthcare, etc) that has a substantial benefit to society as a whole.
i.e. providing it at low or no cost at point of use can be a great idea.
- robertlagrant 2y agoIt can be, yes. But if it has a substantial benefit, maybe it should cost more.
- SideburnsOfDoom 2y ago> But if it has a substantial benefit, maybe it should cost more. This makes no sense whatsoever. That conclusion does not follow - that's what the above comment says.