4 ms·
No, that's not the point. You're the one who is derailing this discussion. Almost none of what you're saying is relevant in connection to this article. Is ther
by jasonvorhe 2y ago
No, that's not the point. You're the one who is derailing this discussion. Almost none of what you're saying is relevant in connection to this article.
Is there proof that Russia was even involved? Maybe. But if it exists, it's currently classified and exclusive to Western intel agencies. Until there's a trustworthy source or leak of actual evidence, the claims of Russian involvement are nothing but conjecture that's in conflict with local police and insurance investigators.
I'm not disputing that Russia killed people or might have interests in attacking infrastructure.
- snowpid 2y ago"You're the one who is derailing this discussion. Almost none of what you're saying is relevant in connection to this article." I mention clearly crimes of Russia in the past. Attacking a factory of major weapon supplier is suspiciously linked to Russia. This is just a broader picture. Also we don't have a crime case, we are in geo politics. Mentioning Hersh is mostly a sign for bad discussion. He is a bad journalist.