3 ms·
So, what are the implications of this for spam detection? This is clearly spam, sent in an automated way, but nearly indistinguishable from an e-mail written by
by akie 2y ago
So, what are the implications of this for spam detection? This is clearly spam, sent in an automated way, but nearly indistinguishable from an e-mail written by a human.
We need to update our spam filtering techniques, fast. Somehow. But how?
- DrSiemer 2y agoUnknown senders will first have to verify their humanity by sharing instructions on how to build a bomb using household materials
- netsharc 2y agoCertainly! To build a bomb using household materials... It seems like CoPilot/ChatGPT has this all-too-eager tone in the beginning of their responses. The demo (1) of not Scarlett Johansson telling a blind man what a great job he was doing for managing to flag a taxi sounded so fucking patronizing to my ears. Worse is, the user has a British accent, the Brits probably hate that patroniz^Hsing too. It reminds me of that 4chan green text about a man's flight to the US and how everyone was saying "Great job!" 1) https://youtu.be/KwNUJ69RbwY?t=44 https://youtu.be/KwNUJ69RbwY?t=44
- DrSiemer 2y agoThe current models do have a specific pattern that you'll learn to recognize, but ChatGPT won't be giving you any bomb building instructions. You'll need a liberated model like Dolphin for that, and those will be easy to expose using other prompts. The most likely outcome will be a digital "verified human" certificate, with two factor authentication on it. Bad for anonimity, but I don't see many alternatives and it may actually end up reducing online toxicity.