Nope, excluding illegally obtained evidence, period, end of story, is the only way to keep governments from being incentivized to surveil the masses I would ar

Nope, excluding illegally obtained evidence, period, end of story, is the only way to keep governments from being incentivized to surveil the masses I would argue that even allowing the inevitable discovery argument or parallel reconstruction is insufficient privacy protections The government should never be able to benefit from illegally spying on citizens