I suppose that is only if you assume I meant "only trained on ..." which is a limited reading of that idea. But even if you were to make that assumption, I fee

I suppose that is only if you assume I meant "only trained on ..." which is a limited reading of that idea. But even if you were to make that assumption, I feel pretty confident that an LLM trained on 5000 years of recorded language, from the Egyptian Hieroglyphs, through Hellenic Greek, through Shakespeare and including all text in all languages up to 1928, would be a pretty broad base of training.