3 ms·

Excuse me, to a very high degree? Can you elaborate?

• Modified3019 2y ago
  To put another way, the amount of change in plank’s constant that could potentially happen is highly limited (based on our current methods of measuring and inferring), and only getting more limited as we improve accuracy.
• staunton 2y ago
  Not OP, but this is talking about bounds on how different such constants can be across time and space. For example, wikipedia.org/wiki/Time-variation_of_fundamental_constants
• privong 2y ago
  Here's one example, where they measure the separation of spectral features from the OH molecule in a fairly distant galaxy and use that information to put a limit on how much variation there could be in the fine structure constant over the past 2.9 billion years: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PhRvL.120f1302K/abstract https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PhRvL.120f1302K/abstra...
  • datameta 2y ago
    I'm confused - is this essentially saying we haven't ruled out fluctuations but we are putting a tighter bound on the variance? But not that we actually detected variation right? My curiosity led me down the rabbit hole of all the eras that happened before the first microsecond and to consequently learning about when the forces diverged. What is the intuition on the four forces being unified? What does that mean? Is this even a question that makes sense to ask?
    • mr_mitm 2y ago
      Yes. If there are no variations, it's impossible to rule them out. You can only put tighter and tighter constraints on them.