3 ms·
The switching cost from local almost-SQS to expensive HA SQS for scale and/or the client. SQS is not a reliable exactly-once messaging protocol like AMQP, and
by westurner 2y ago
The switching cost from local almost-SQS to expensive HA SQS for scale and/or the client.
SQS is not a reliable exactly-once messaging protocol like AMQP, and it doesn't do task-level accounting or result storage (which SQLite also solves for).
Apache Kafka > See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Kafka https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Kafka
- chromanoid 2y agoSQS is not particularly expensive. I don't know where you are getting at. I work on a project with SQS and I worked with RabbitMQ, ArtemisMQ and other MOM technologies as well. At least once delivery is something you can achieve easily. This would be the common ground that SQS can also provide. The same is true for Kafka.