> It did so by blithely assuming that those algorithmic decisions are equivalent to the expressive decisions made by human editors at newspapers. Because human

> It did so by blithely assuming that those algorithmic decisions are equivalent to the expressive decisions made by human editors at newspapers. Because human editors pick the algorithms. The algorithms are not independent actors, they are concrete implementations of editors' intentions. As someone who writes algorithms-for-editors for food I am painfully aware of that.