2 ms·
The rentier class doesn't want to lose the ability to extract rents from users in perpetuity, so they - shareholders and investors in the tech sector - are not
by photochemsyn 2y ago
The rentier class doesn't want to lose the ability to extract rents from users in perpetuity, so they - shareholders and investors in the tech sector - are not going to support a model where the user has complete control of their hardware and software once an initial purchase is made.
It's gotten pretty ridiculous - let's say you buy a hammer. But to keep using the hammer, you have to pay a monthly subscription or the hammer stops working. And this is considered normal? Of course there are some tools that are so complex that you don't want to have to buy them and maintain them, so renting makes much more sense - but if your whole world is structured that way, you're just being bled.
- alexlazar97 2y agoI agree. Big co and VC funded startups will find it hard to do the self-hosted model. But small software companies or "indie hackers" (like me) can make it make sense. It's also a good way for us to differentiate ourselves and have an angle in the bigger markets. If I and 5 other devs go and make Dropbox, for example, you won't look at us. Dropbox will be much better. But if we offer a self-hosted version, we might just be able to carve a small portion of the market for ourselves through that angle.