It looks like they're using a third number to signify dev builds (which I think git has built-in support for), so also having a third number signify patches cou

It looks like they're using a third number to signify dev builds (which I think git has built-in support for), so also having a third number signify patches could get confusing. > All subsequent dev builds after a release will be numbers added on to it. For example, 144 commits after 2409 would result in dev build 2409-144. Also, I don't think leading with the year follows semantic versioning either (?)