4 ms·
If you have to resort to such an extreme scenario then the ruling probably is a good one.
by georgeplusplus 2y ago
If you have to resort to such an extreme scenario then the ruling probably is a good one.
- Hammershaft 2y agoThat scenario is from the dissenting opinion of justice sotomayer in the pdf brief. Trump's lawyers argued that immunity extends to assassinating political opponents.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- georgeplusplus 2y agoSource?
- RavingGoat 2y agoIt makes the president a king. If Trump gets reelected do you think he will ever leave office? If you think that's far fetched then you haven't read Project 2025 where he can replace weather service employees that don't make forecasts he likes.
- jasomill 2y agoShort of a civil war, yes, because the text of the 22nd Amendment is unambiguous and requires considerably more process than a supermajority in the House and Senate to overturn.
- mcphage 2y agoDid you seriously just argue that "if this decision has the potential for extreme negative consequences, then it must be a good decision"?