4 ms·
Hey kosolam! There are already many forks and ports of existing browsers. Do we really need another one? :) By building a new engine, we can increase ecosystem
by awesomekling 2y ago
Hey kosolam! There are already many forks and ports of existing browsers. Do we really need another one? :)
By building a new engine, we can increase ecosystem diversity and put all these open standards to the test. We regularly find, report, and sometimes even fix bugs in the various web standards - stuff we find just by being the first to try and implement everything from scratch in a long time!
We also believe it’s good for the world to have more engines that aren’t directly or indirectly funded primarily by the advertising industry.
- criddell 2y agoRelying on open standards is risky. It seems to me the de facto standard is whatever Chrome or Blink does.
- ykonstant 2y agoThat's the unique value proposition of Ladybird. It uses the open standards as the jumping point, investigates and de facto documents the divergence of modern browsers from them. It is a precious and important work.
- criddell 2y agoHow is knowing where the published standards diverge from de facto standards precious and important work? You say that's where the value is, but the subset of people and organizations who would pay for that (if it's valuable, people will pay, right?) has to be pretty small.
- ykonstant 2y ago>(if it's valuable, people will pay, right?) No? There are tons of valuable contributions, pure and applied, that "people" (markets) do not pay for at all, or pay pittance relative to their usefulness.
- paddim8 2y agoIt makes it much easier to build new engines in the future. Even if only a few people are interested in this knowledge, they can make a big impact with the software they write.
- xeromal 2y agoI don't think important work necessarily means that people will pay for it. The team thinks it is important work therefor it is.
- arresin 2y agoSo freaking cool