-Its specifically relevant as it's what the article is talking about. Of course the output can be used to produce copyrighted materials but this relies on the u

-Its specifically relevant as it's what the article is talking about. Of course the output can be used to produce copyrighted materials but this relies on the user inputting specific variables. Much like someone rewriting a copyright work in word, this is just way easier to do but ease of copying is not covered by copyright law. -LLM's do indeed have a model of the world. They are no longer regression models that simply have a model of words and frequencies (although I'd argue this is still transformative use), worth checking out just how powerful GPT's are and how they work. -That argument would imply any new novel method that can replace a copyright method would be infringing. Ideally there should be multiple ways to do something and the AI would produce it's own median/mean way based on its learnings. Yes I agree the customers can, but that is not what Hassabis is defending.