> What I feel like the dissent misses completely, which is quite ironic given Justice Sotomayor’s history in private practice Why do you presume that the disse

> What I feel like the dissent misses completely, which is quite ironic given Justice Sotomayor’s history in private practice Why do you presume that the dissent did not consider this? What are your qualifications to think you’ve considered this more completely than the SCOTUS (whether or not you agree)?