3 ms·
> This is wrong, and your ability to make an argument suggests you know it is. citationneeded.jpg > And the most extreme acts being mentioned as risks are the
by lenerdenator 2y ago
> This is wrong, and your ability to make an argument suggests you know it is.
citationneeded.jpg
> And the most extreme acts being mentioned as risks are the exact ones where "presumptive" matters.
Are they? Can you count on humans to not abuse power? I don't trust the SCOTUS to provide a real counterweight. These are the same people who knew that 12-year-olds would be giving birth with the overturn of Roe v. Wade, and did it anyways. The same institution that ignored votes in 2000 and appointed a President. The same institution who had no power to stop Andrew Jackson from committing genocidal acts against the Cherokee. Either ineffective or complicit in severe violations of constitutional rights.
- danielmarkbruce 2y agoOk, i gave too much credit. Here's your citation: https://prod-i.a.dj.com/public/resources/documents/SCOTUSTRUMPDC.pdf https://prod-i.a.dj.com/public/resources/documents/SCOTUSTRU... Read the ruling itself. Roe v Wade was an easy overturn from a legal perspective. Pro choice folks with half a brain knew it stood on nonsense. Obama said in 2007 he wanted to codify it because he knew it was standing on shaky logic.