3 ms·
Good! And good luck with that. I think Brazil made noises like this for a short time some years ago. I don't think it went anywhere but it is clearly the sane
by Brian_K_White 2y ago
Good! And good luck with that.
I think Brazil made noises like this for a short time some years ago. I don't think it went anywhere but it is clearly the sane ideal, and is just a failing that we don't have it. A normal failing like countless others, bit still a failing.
To me it never made sense for any public facilities to rely on anything the public couldn't at least audit, let alone modify to remove any artificial private-serving restrictions like undocumented file formats and artificial lack of inteteroperability with other software and old versions of the same software etc.
Maybe eventually this will be a thing, but will probably take forever.
Assuming this doesn't really stick long term, at least it seems that very gradually, more municipalities are trying.
Sooner or later maybe it will start to stick, maybe only in some smaller places at first that can get away with being opinionated and principled, and too small for MS and Oracle to fight too hard over.
But those may beget a few others. Maybe once tiny town down the road does it, slightly larger town realizes they could too. And then maybe you have a world where say 2% of public official things don't use Office or Oracle etc.
That starts to make it important for everyone else to support agnostic compatibility as a real thing they actually have to support instead of just forcing all their users to use Edge or Chrome or Office etc.
And once that starts to happen, once most services and products actually work with firefox and libreoffice etc, it makes it less crazy and unimaginable for some larger less hippy idealist municipalities to actually consider the principled argument. They have less ammo to shoot it down.
- IG_Semmelweiss 2y agoWhat ia your perspective on why this failed implementation in Brazil? Was it because mon compliance was not punished ? Or perhaps there was no system tontest for compliance?
- mlinhares 2y agoThere was a push from the government itself to buy open source but not to require companies to publish or make their sources available. Not sure if this was what the OP was talking about. It was later undone because providing support for these alternatives sucked (open office and the like), people didn't want to use tools they had no experience with and corruption, as the big players could just bribe people to buy closed source software.