6 ms·
Space rocket crashes in flames after accidental launch
- macmac 2y ago"accidental launch" - I am no rocket scientist, but that sounds bad.
- mr_toad 2y agoI was curious how often this happens. I couldn’t find many examples, and they’re all military: In 2022 India accidentally fired a missile at Pakistan: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/indias-inadvertent-missile-launch-underscores-the-risk-of-accidental-nuclear-warfare/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/indias-inadverten... In 1970 the USAF accidentally launched a missile carrying nuclear material, and it landed in Mexico: https://unredacted.com/2015/07/13/usaf-accidentally-launched-rocket-into-mexicos-mapimi-desert-45-years-ago/ https://unredacted.com/2015/07/13/usaf-accidentally-launched... I’m 1967 the accidental launch of a rocket on board the USS Forrestal killed 134 people and nearly destroyed the ship: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/uss-forrestal-accidental-rocket-launch-nearly-destroyed-navy-aircraft-carrier-208625 https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/uss-forrestal-acciden...
- serf 2y agoI think 'accidental launch during a static fire test' deserves a distinction; the ignition wasn't accidental, the restraint failure was.
- mr_toad 2y agoMy brief searching couldn’t find any previous examples of a rocket escaping during a static fire test, or even of an orbital class rocket being launched accidentally, so this may be unique.
- ethbr1 2y agoLess "accidental launch" and more "failure of the bits that were securing the rocket for a static test."
- anamexis 2y agoWhat’s the distinction?
- ethbr1 2y agoWhat broke.
- MyelinatedT 2y agoThere is some indication that the failure point was in the rocket’s structure itself. So, the bits doing the securing may have worked fine, but the rocket just ripped itself off the pad and left the bolted-down bits behind. Either way, a very embarrassing engineering and operational failure.
- mianos 2y agoHold down bolts from Temu that were pot metal plated plastic? :)
- mianos 2y agoFor those downvoting me for humour (no one one hurt), the explanation was, due to the rush it had no tie downs or top weights like a normal SpaceX engine test. The only thing holding it down was scaffolding. If you look at the photos of the site, you can see it's just a weight bearing scaffold and not a engine load bearing structural brace. This is very hard to believe.
- thot_experiment 2y agoStatic test became a dynamic test. Bad look for sure, flight was most definitely not terminated intentionally and the rocket, still full of fuel, crashed back down to earth after multiple engine failures and exploded. This happened in a relatively populated area and there the resulting overpressure definitely at least broke some windows in a relatively dense metro.
- gbraad 2y agoYou left the most important part out of the title.
- nodesocket 2y agoWhy didn’t you add “Chinese” space rocket?
- ChrisArchitect 2y ago[dupe] Some more discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40837229 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40837229