5 ms·
That's the problem. The ruling provides no guidance whatsoever, so as long as a President can make the case, it's an official act.
by electrondood 2y ago
That's the problem. The ruling provides no guidance whatsoever, so as long as a President can make the case, it's an official act.
- danielmarkbruce 2y agoNo, that's not right. The court will decide, and they do give some thoughts/guidance.
- redserk 2y agoWell no, you’re making an assumption with how a court would rule in this situation. There is nothing mandating that a court has to put careful consideration between what is and isn’t official business.
- danielmarkbruce 2y agoNo, wrong. The comment says the court will rule, not how they'll rule. How on earth do you read that comment and think it says how they'll rule?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- theGnuMe 2y agoThe Courts are dumb and often change their minds on appeal. All of this ends up at the Supreme Court where the clerics now rule.
- danielmarkbruce 2y agoAnything which reaches the supreme court is complicated, by definition. On top of that the world changes and the people sitting on the bench change. So yeah, the court changes it's "mind" from time to time. The idea that they are "clerics" because they make a decision you disagree with is nonsensical.
- theGnuMe 2y agoComplicated by definition means absolutely nothing. Most cases are not complex but were decided on political ideology. This is why they tend to flip decisions. Anyway the current crop are indeed clerics. https://verdict.justia.com/2023/05/03/how-did-six-conservative-catholics-become-supreme-court-justices-together https://verdict.justia.com/2023/05/03/how-did-six-conservati...
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]