This is the same loophole applied to qualified immunity in general. On the surface, it appears like there's criteria to consider, but such criteria cannot poss

This is the same loophole applied to qualified immunity in general. On the surface, it appears like there's criteria to consider, but such criteria cannot possibly exist. It's like saying, "Bribery is only illegal if it is called bribery during the commission of the crime. But also, The State cannot investigate what was discussed during such events without evidence that a crime was committed." They are basically establishing legal paradoxes.