3 ms·
>a dangerous line That's the same lukewarm sentiment that he's always received. It was an impeachable, criminal act. My point is that he got away with it anyw
by treeFall 2y ago
>a dangerous line
That's the same lukewarm sentiment that he's always received. It was an impeachable, criminal act.
My point is that he got away with it anyways, even without this "official act" clarification. Which just goes to show you that people whipping themselves into a frenzy about this have not been paying attention. They're using the most extreme language ("Seal Team 6 assassinations!!!") to describe some hypothetical that has already occurred without this ruling. It's silly.
- stephenr 2y agoI have no specific knowledge of the case you're referring to. I'll just assume it happened as you say it did. Why are you upset that people are concerned by a ruling allowing exactly what you're concerned about? Shouldn't you be upset that neither the DOJ nor Congress took action against the President in question?