3 ms·
Yup, all the originalists and textualists on the court running and hiding when the outcome benefits their person. Instead it's just "Well, we like trump so let
by cogman10 2y ago
Yup, all the originalists and textualists on the court running and hiding when the outcome benefits their person. Instead it's just "Well, we like trump so let's benefit him".
What a horrible corrupt court.
I'm 1000% sure that if trump wins and starts prosecuting his political rivals the court will give it the nod as being AOK.
- WillPostForFood 2y agoThe supreme court ruled against Trump many times during his first term. Census rules, immigration, 2020 election lawsuits. Reality doesn't match your perception.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- cogman10 2y agoRuling against trump on minor issues isn't the same as ruling for him because he's the best chance to be a conservative president. And for every one of these rulings, which frankly were all him blatantly ignoring/violating the law in ways that even this court couldn't ignore, there were 10 cases where the courts moved forward conservative agendas. Further, many of those rulings happened while Ginsberg was still alive with Roberts as the swing vote. That's no longer the makeup of the court. You are playing the "yeah but what about" game. The reality is the supreme court just vested kingship on the next conservative president.