3 ms·
Get control of the senate. It wouldn't have mattered if they gave him his day, he wasn't going to get nominated. The republicans nominated Robert Bork back in t
by danielmarkbruce 2y ago
Get control of the senate. It wouldn't have mattered if they gave him his day, he wasn't going to get nominated. The republicans nominated Robert Bork back in the day, and the dems (then in control of the senate) voted it down. It's basically the same thing - the system working as intended.
- TylerE 2y agoNo, it bloody well isn’t. Republicans refused to hold the vote on Garland, spouting off nonsense about “No new justices in an election year”. The same people rammed judges through in Trumps last year. Typical right wing hypocrisy.
- danielmarkbruce 2y agoAnd if they'd had the vote? The result would have been no. Same result.
- TylerE 2y agoIt would have put a lot of prominent Republicans - including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell - in an awkward position because a number of them had previously said he was a great candidate for the court. So, they either make a liar out of themselves, or become a rank hypocrite.
- danielmarkbruce 2y agoThey are politicians... Anyway, I'll grant it's symbolically different and it wasn't a good look. In practice though, the senate has to be on board with the nomination and in both cases they were not and it didn't go through in either.