I dont think it is as routine as you think and citizens typically get completely outraged by actions like Kelo v. New London, and are far more OK with eminent d

I dont think it is as routine as you think and citizens typically get completely outraged by actions like Kelo v. New London, and are far more OK with eminent domain for public infrastructure. Do you really think public sentiment is the opposite? >Like draw me a coherent line as to why a developer sucking up land via eminent domain should be legally allowed but the public building a train is not My whole point is that building a train is a legitimate use (IMO), but taking the adjacent land just to sell to developers make the state money is not.