WPF is still a perfectly viable solution > The issue is that with bundling the .dll, it would still mean it being extracted somewhere and writing additional co

WPF is still a perfectly viable solution > The issue is that with bundling the .dll, it would still mean it being extracted somewhere and writing additional code for the P/Invoke to work, and C++/CLI gets compiled to .NET IL code, in other words, you can open the resulting app in dnSpy and see the C++ code translated to C# equivalent (which is not what I want, I want native code). I don’t understand how that makes WPF a non-viable solution. The author seems to have pretty strong feeling that it should absolutely be native code, but it’s not clear why