4 ms·
Considering they were able to identify a genetic difference in the groups, no?
by ebiester 2y ago
Considering they were able to identify a genetic difference in the groups, no?
- duffyjp 2y agoThat part wasn't clear to my layman's understanding... > Lastly, we identified a specific gene called HLA-DQA2, which was expressed (activated to produce a protein) at a much higher level in the volunteers who did not go on to develop a sustained infection So everybody has this gene, but it was more expressed in those who didn't get sick. What causes the difference? Something genetic or something environmental?
- taeric 2y agoI'd love to get a confirmation on if that is what this means? Seems odd to reference it the way they did if we all have the gene. My reading was more that it would be like the gene for a certain hair color. But, my reading is a very naive one, to be sure.