as tptacek's link makes clear, "major questions" was a muddied and rarely-cited corner of the law in 2016. The "major questions doctrine" per se made its appear

as tptacek's link makes clear, "major questions" was a muddied and rarely-cited corner of the law in 2016. The "major questions doctrine" per se made its appearance in the 2022 decision and was in fact the main purpose of writing a decision banning a rule that had never taken effect and was now obsolete. When Carr (echoing the conservative majority in Loper) claims that Chevron was all but dead already due to MQD, that certainly wasn't the case before 2022. So your pedantic correction is missing the point even if it were textually accurate.