The premise of this article is flawed. It assumes that higher performance automatically leads to higher income. What’s more, the summary points out particular

The premise of this article is flawed. It assumes that higher performance automatically leads to higher income. What’s more, the summary points out particular data points which result from step wise tax system and tries to turn it into an “anti performance” argument. I can’t help but believe that either the summary or the paper is more ideologically motivated than anything else.