>The problem is, it works most of the time, when it doesn't it's dangerous. That "most of the time" part isn't large enough for people to ignore the failures.

>The problem is, it works most of the time, when it doesn't it's dangerous. That "most of the time" part isn't large enough for people to ignore the failures. I doubt that. A lot of failures will be ignored and only fixed if and when necessary because they are not usually very dangerous. A lot of information we produce is never acted on. And a lot of information we do act on is incorrect or unfounded anyway. Also, in places where hallucinations are unacceptable, double checking some facts is still far cheaper than manually producing the whole thing from scratch. I bet we will see an avalanche of incorrect and funny information coming from customer support systems. And yet very few people will want to pay for better fact checking.