4 ms·
Thanks for the real meat, the transcript. So now, why is it forbidden for participants to record the interview also? Apparently only the court is allowed to do
by rurban 2y ago
Thanks for the real meat, the transcript.
So now, why is it forbidden for participants to record the interview also? Apparently only the court is allowed to do so, which makes editing / censoring / falsifying court records really easy. This sounds extremely worrying to me.
I only found this UK legislation https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Guidance-No.-42-Remote-Hearings.pdf https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Guidance...
- yencabulator 2y agoGenerally, courts can strike items from the transcript, if someone misspeaks / reveals things they were not supposed to reveal / if a witness speaks to things that were not part of the question, etc. That mechanism would slip a lot more often if there were multiple recordings. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_to_strike_(court_of_law) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_to_strike_(court_of_law... I'm pretty sure committees examining confidential materials routinely have someone review the transcript for accidental disclosures.