11 ms·

Hinduism is a new term. We follow Sanatana Dharma and our basis is Vedism. Judaism..as it is now.. wasn’t always monotheist. And it evolved over time. And not

Hinduism is a new term. We follow Sanatana Dharma and our basis is Vedism. Judaism..as it is now.. wasn’t always monotheist. And it evolved over time. And not as old as Hinduism. Texts and inscriptions and temples from the Vedic period are much older. And that’s why there has been a systematic purge, revisionism, faulty translations and suppression of civilizational history. Hinduism..as it’s known now..is and was decentralized giving it the ability to survive and thrive millennia. While it can be called many names and has been co opted, our source text is common to all who call themselves Hindu and that is the Vedas…our religious text.

wslh 2y ago
The context of my answer is that you cannot include Abrahamic religions in your comments without separating the root, which is Judaism, to your claim. You said: "It worked out well as a diverse society with one identity until monotheistic Abrahamic faiths and their adherents came as invaders and colonizers.".
- jelliclesfarm 2y ago
  Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all ‘People of the Book’. Hindus scriptural texts are the Vedas. Abrahamic faiths are monotheistic and against idol worship. While not all Hindus worship idols and multiple gods, these practices are not blasphemy or apostasy. There is a binary criteria amongst Abrahamic religions about what constitutes membership.
  - wslh 2y ago
    Re: "Abrahamic faiths and their adherents came as invaders and colonizers".
    - NoRagrets 2y ago
      The adherents of the Jewish faith did not come as invaders or colonizers but the other monotheists faiths came to evangelize and convert the native population as polytheism was an affront to their religious sensibilities.
selimthegrim 2y ago
Sikhs and Jains and tribals are Hindu now?
- NoRagrets 2y ago
  They are not Hindus. Having said that, they are all covered by the Hindu Personal Law. And there is a separate Muslim Personal Law aka Shariat Law in ‘secular’ India. For the purposes of the law, they are all Hindus. But from a faith based perspective, they are all separate religions whose congregations are considered a minority.

wslh 2y ago

The context of my answer is that you cannot include Abrahamic religions in your comments without separating the root, which is Judaism, to your claim. You said: "It worked out well as a diverse society with one identity until monotheistic Abrahamic faiths and their adherents came as invaders and colonizers.".

jelliclesfarm 2y ago
Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all ‘People of the Book’. Hindus scriptural texts are the Vedas. Abrahamic faiths are monotheistic and against idol worship. While not all Hindus worship idols and multiple gods, these practices are not blasphemy or apostasy. There is a binary criteria amongst Abrahamic religions about what constitutes membership.
- wslh 2y ago
  Re: "Abrahamic faiths and their adherents came as invaders and colonizers".
  - NoRagrets 2y ago
    The adherents of the Jewish faith did not come as invaders or colonizers but the other monotheists faiths came to evangelize and convert the native population as polytheism was an affront to their religious sensibilities.

selimthegrim 2y ago

Sikhs and Jains and tribals are Hindu now?

NoRagrets 2y ago
They are not Hindus. Having said that, they are all covered by the Hindu Personal Law. And there is a separate Muslim Personal Law aka Shariat Law in ‘secular’ India. For the purposes of the law, they are all Hindus. But from a faith based perspective, they are all separate religions whose congregations are considered a minority.