> 79.15% of our pricing operations averaged 1 second or less response time These numbers are thrown out there like they're supposed to be impressive. They must

> 79.15% of our pricing operations averaged 1 second or less response time These numbers are thrown out there like they're supposed to be impressive. They must be doing some really complex stuff to justify that. For a web server to have a p79 of 1 second is generally terrible. > 79.01% to average 2 seconds or less And after the migration it gets FAR worse. I get that it's a finance product, but from what they wrote it doesn't seem like a large dataset. How is this the best performance they're getting? Also a migration where your p79 (p-anything) doubled is a gigantic failure in my books. I guess latency really mustn't be critical to their product