10 ms·
It seems kind of regressive for a common tax to pay for the aquifer that primarily benefits the farmers. If its paid for by taxing the farmers directly, or at l
by anonymouskimmer 2y ago
It seems kind of regressive for a common tax to pay for the aquifer that primarily benefits the farmers. If its paid for by taxing the farmers directly, or at least proportionately, then sure, it probably wouldn't be regressive.
- cyberax 2y agoI don't think the author meant "regressive" in that sense. For them it means: "Actually thinking about a solution instead of wringing hands"