3 ms·

UWP was designed primarily for Windows phones, usability on desktops suffers. And it requires windows store, you can’t just ship an installer .exe WinUI seems

UWP was designed primarily for Windows phones, usability on desktops suffers. And it requires windows store, you can’t just ship an installer .exe WinUI seems to be copy-pasted from UWP, same usability issues on desktops. Unlike UWP, it’s a mess in terms of software quality. Also the runtime is huge, I think the size in MB even exceeds Electron. About MAUI, it seems Microsoft decided to make an abstraction over native controls. It’s been tried for decades and it always results in the same suboptimal result because these GUI frameworks implement the least common denominator of available UX. In addition to that, on Windows that thing uses WinUI3 backend, see the previous paragraph. I don’t know anything about Blazor, but it seems that thing is for web apps?

pjmlp 2y ago
MAUI is basically Xamarin.Forms, rebranded and rewritten, thus forcing the whole Xamarin community to rewrite their stuff, or go elsewhere. Miguel de Icaza is pretty sour on this, and quite likely one of the reasons he is now fully into Apple ecosystem and Swift. Blazor started with being only a WebAssembly based framework, then they decided to put everthing on ASP.NET under Blazor umbrella, and are now pushing Blazor into everything that has a Webview, including the stupid idea of Hybrid Blazor in MAUI, basically Electron in .NET.
- glzone1 2y ago
  Blazor is interesting. They are biting off an absolutely metric done of stuff. I will say their development style -> social media etc seems good which might help drive some buyin. They have public roadmaps. The outcomes still pretty rough ("Could not reconnect to the server") when falling off the happy path. So it still had a bit of that "in theory" development style that in terms of use annoys developers.