2 ms·
The MOU of the protestors was to overthrow the government. Seems like an appropriate response. https://archive.org/details/convoymou2022/page/3/mode/2up https:
by rexfarwell 2y ago
The MOU of the protestors was to overthrow the government. Seems like an appropriate response.
https://archive.org/details/convoymou2022/page/3/mode/2up https://archive.org/details/convoymou2022/page/3/mode/2up
- s1artibartfast 2y agoThe MOU was no more an overthrow than people proposing any policy. IF protesters request the government set up a community oversight board for the police or build a playground, that wouldn't not be overthrow either. I have seen the MOU linked several times, but nobody has ever made a coherent argument how it constitutes treason, overthrow, or anything else of that nature. It is a simple list of demands from protesters, primarily that the government drop vaccine mandates and vaccine passports.
- rexfarwell 2y agoThe protestors wanted the "Federal Government" to enforce their versions of laws in the MOU or they were to resign, and were prepared to take over by force if the MOU was not signed or their demands were not met. They wanted to have their own January 6 moment, but in Canada this time.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoNone of that is supported by the document you linked. It is just a list of demands. Is it a insurrection any time a protester makes a demand?