> I care much more about user-replaceable batteries Then I strongly encourage a trip down memory lane to one year ago when this was actually decided and discus

> I care much more about user-replaceable batteries Then I strongly encourage a trip down memory lane to one year ago when this was actually decided and discussed [0]. Lots of good info there on exactly this topic. > I don't see why the iphone 16 battery should somehow be the "meat" of the announcement. Because behind the misleading title of the submission that "The EU regulates [...]" is really content about the material Apple will use. I already mentioned this and quoted that content to avoid too much of the discussion being besides the point and reduce the threshold of effort needed to get the info down to approximately 0. Still too high I take it? [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36361510 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36361510