4 ms·
It strikes me that having the C++ requirement is part of what makes this difficult. I'd like to have seen some reasoning why not to just use C#. Seems like it
by pugworthy 2y ago
It strikes me that having the C++ requirement is part of what makes this difficult. I'd like to have seen some reasoning why not to just use C#. Seems like it could have made some things easier, especially given the author's praise of XAML and acceptance of Visual Studio.
I'm not saying C# is better than C++, but just that choosing one over the other does have an impact.
- chipdart 2y ago> It strikes me that having the C++ requirement is part of what makes this difficult. It doesn't. In fact, it makes the problem even easier to solve due to the options that are already on the table. Virtually all .NET-based frameworks support C++ besides C#, specially WinUI3.
- pjmlp 2y agoWinUI support for C++ is a travel back to the days of writing COM in Visual C++ 6.0 with ATL, only for a special bread of developers.