2 ms·
> I think there is something to the “interaction with an environment” paradigm for consciousness. It’s not clear to me that interaction with a much, much more p
by Bluestein 2y ago
> I think there is something to the “interaction with an environment” paradigm for consciousness. It’s not clear to me that interaction with a much, much more parameter constrained environment such as textual data will lead to consciousness in a way that we can recognise it.
I am of that mind myself.
- Bluestein 2y agoPS Incidentally, that's why I find approaches such as the article's - or, more recently Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) - to be interesting. At some point we'll need architectural progress if we really want to move forward.- This, for example, makes for a very interesting read, and might be on to something: - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40820942 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40820942