3 ms·

The submission title has almost nothing to do with the meat of the announcement. This unfortunately is buried in a link from a tweet, quoted by another tweet, a

The submission title has almost nothing to do with the meat of the announcement. This unfortunately is buried in a link from a tweet, quoted by another tweet, about 2-3x past the threshold of effort most people put into reading to get to the point. This is a manufacturer of stainless steel battery cases announcing Apple will use them for the battery in the iPhone 16 [0]. > Sunway is a major supplier of stainless steel battery cases. > Apple uses the stainless steel battery case for the first time as a thermal solution > Looking forward to 2025, if all 2H25 new iPhones adopt this new design [0] https://medium.com/@mingchikuo/%E4%BF%A1%E7%B6%AD%E9%80%9A%E4%BF%A1%E7%82%BA%E6%96%B0%E6%AC%BEiphone-16-pro-max%E7%9A%84%E9%9B%BB%E6%B1%A0%E8%83%BD%E9%87%8F%E5%AF%86%E5%BA%A6%E5%8D%87%E7%B4%9A%E7%9A%84%E4%B8%BB%E8%A6%81%E5%8F%97%E7%9B%8A%E8%80%85-sunway-is-a-major-beneficiary-of-the-new-iphone-16-pro-9df9c5cd3913 https://medium.com/@mingchikuo/%E4%BF%A1%E7%B6%AD%E9%80%9A%E...

g15jv2dp 2y ago
I don't care about the material of batteries in apple's phones. I care much more about user-replaceable batteries. I don't think I'm alone in that and I don't see why the iphone 16 battery should somehow be the "meat" of the announcement.
- buran77 2y ago
  > I care much more about user-replaceable batteries Then I strongly encourage a trip down memory lane to one year ago when this was actually decided and discussed [0]. Lots of good info there on exactly this topic. > I don't see why the iphone 16 battery should somehow be the "meat" of the announcement. Because behind the misleading title of the submission that "The EU regulates [...]" is really content about the material Apple will use. I already mentioned this and quoted that content to avoid too much of the discussion being besides the point and reduce the threshold of effort needed to get the info down to approximately 0. Still too high I take it? [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36361510 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36361510

g15jv2dp 2y ago

I don't care about the material of batteries in apple's phones. I care much more about user-replaceable batteries. I don't think I'm alone in that and I don't see why the iphone 16 battery should somehow be the "meat" of the announcement.

buran77 2y ago
> I care much more about user-replaceable batteries Then I strongly encourage a trip down memory lane to one year ago when this was actually decided and discussed [0]. Lots of good info there on exactly this topic. > I don't see why the iphone 16 battery should somehow be the "meat" of the announcement. Because behind the misleading title of the submission that "The EU regulates [...]" is really content about the material Apple will use. I already mentioned this and quoted that content to avoid too much of the discussion being besides the point and reduce the threshold of effort needed to get the info down to approximately 0. Still too high I take it? [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36361510 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36361510