3 ms·
I don't know anything about the legal side of any of this convo but your "Incorrect" followed up by saying in apparent seriousness that there are laws for fish
by collingreen 2y ago
I don't know anything about the legal side of any of this convo but your "Incorrect" followed up by saying in apparent seriousness that there are laws for fish but not THIS PARTICULAR kind of fish made me actually laugh out loud.
Internet comments have the funniest versions of good and bad faith.
- stackskipton 2y agoBut that's entire debate in the case with SCOTUS and this is a ton of US law. Section A/B/C says these kind of fish boats must be monitored, and fishing boats being monitored will pay for said monitors. Section D says these kinds of fishing boats shall be monitored as well but nothing about who pays for it. You will find US law RIDDLED with these inconsistencies.